<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Experiences of Test Automation	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/knowledge/experiences-of-test-automation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/knowledge/experiences-of-test-automation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:26:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Roberto R		</title>
		<link>https://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/knowledge/experiences-of-test-automation/#comment-33780</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roberto R]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2020 15:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/?p=7517#comment-33780</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Awesome! It is one of the good books by Dorothy Graham to learn about the success stories of software test automation. I strongly agree with quote #4. Yes, even highly trained manual testers will not surpass an automated suite of test cases because there are constraints like in case if there is a requirement to test a large-scale software system, manual testers will not be apt to deal with it. But, I have heard that there are some stories where businesses have achieved success by getting manual testers involved in automation, I&#039;m not sure. Anyway, thanks for this helpful post.

Regards,
Roberto, Testree]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! It is one of the good books by Dorothy Graham to learn about the success stories of software test automation. I strongly agree with quote #4. Yes, even highly trained manual testers will not surpass an automated suite of test cases because there are constraints like in case if there is a requirement to test a large-scale software system, manual testers will not be apt to deal with it. But, I have heard that there are some stories where businesses have achieved success by getting manual testers involved in automation, I&#8217;m not sure. Anyway, thanks for this helpful post.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Roberto, Testree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
