<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Using Equivalence Partitioning in Software Testing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/knowledge/using-equivalence-partitioning-in-software-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/knowledge/using-equivalence-partitioning-in-software-testing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 09:44:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Kenst		</title>
		<link>https://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/knowledge/using-equivalence-partitioning-in-software-testing/#comment-31386</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Kenst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 21:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/?p=5786#comment-31386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/knowledge/using-equivalence-partitioning-in-software-testing/#comment-31385&quot;&gt;Software Testing Magazine&lt;/a&gt;.

Glad I could be help!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/knowledge/using-equivalence-partitioning-in-software-testing/#comment-31385">Software Testing Magazine</a>.</p>
<p>Glad I could be help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Software Testing Magazine		</title>
		<link>https://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/knowledge/using-equivalence-partitioning-in-software-testing/#comment-31385</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Software Testing Magazine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 08:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/?p=5786#comment-31385</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/knowledge/using-equivalence-partitioning-in-software-testing/#comment-31384&quot;&gt;Chris Kenst&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for your insightful comment. You are right, equivalence partitioning can apply to all type of tests. It is my own mistake (not the author) as the introduction is not part of the original article, which is in the book part of a section about test design that covers also boundary analysis and other techniques. I have remove the unit testing reference.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/knowledge/using-equivalence-partitioning-in-software-testing/#comment-31384">Chris Kenst</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for your insightful comment. You are right, equivalence partitioning can apply to all type of tests. It is my own mistake (not the author) as the introduction is not part of the original article, which is in the book part of a section about test design that covers also boundary analysis and other techniques. I have remove the unit testing reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Kenst		</title>
		<link>https://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/knowledge/using-equivalence-partitioning-in-software-testing/#comment-31384</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Kenst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 04:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/?p=5786#comment-31384</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure why the beginning of this article states equivalence class partitioning &quot;divides the test data of a unit testing case&quot;. This technique can be applied across the spectrum from unit tests to higher level functional tests and using glassbox and blackbox approaches. (Unless the author has some different definition of unit testing case.)

It&#039;s also worth pointing out that this technique goes hand in hand with boundary analysis (combined they are called Domain Testing) because in both your small sampling of input values matter.

If you are interested in Domain Testing (equivalence class partitioning and boundary analysis) I highly recommend Cem Kaner&#039;s book &quot;The Domain Testing Workbook&quot;. It has many examples, starting with the most trivial ones and gradually getting harder to challenge you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why the beginning of this article states equivalence class partitioning &#8220;divides the test data of a unit testing case&#8221;. This technique can be applied across the spectrum from unit tests to higher level functional tests and using glassbox and blackbox approaches. (Unless the author has some different definition of unit testing case.)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also worth pointing out that this technique goes hand in hand with boundary analysis (combined they are called Domain Testing) because in both your small sampling of input values matter.</p>
<p>If you are interested in Domain Testing (equivalence class partitioning and boundary analysis) I highly recommend Cem Kaner&#8217;s book &#8220;The Domain Testing Workbook&#8221;. It has many examples, starting with the most trivial ones and gradually getting harder to challenge you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeremy Dozier		</title>
		<link>https://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/knowledge/using-equivalence-partitioning-in-software-testing/#comment-31381</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Dozier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 18:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwaretestingmagazine.com/?p=5786#comment-31381</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent introduction to the concept of equivalence partitionning.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent introduction to the concept of equivalence partitionning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
