Billions of pieces of content hit social media and gaming apps daily. In 2024, Statista reported that people spend an average of 143 minutes on social media alone. That’s a lot of scrolling, tapping, and playing.
Software testers make sure these platforms run smoothly, catching bugs before users notice. But when apps use infinite scrolling or constant notifications to keep us hooked, it raises a question. Are testers helping build tools that can trap us, or are they just doing their job?
Let’s look at what software testers do, the addictive features they refine, and the ethical line they navigate.
Software Testing – A Primer
The software testing market was $87.4 billion in 2024, increasing at an annual rate of 21 percent.
Software testers check that apps work as intended. They test features like fast-loading likes on Instagram or seamless level-ups in Roblox online games. According to Forbes, thorough testing is a must for higher customer satisfaction and lower support costs.
Testers usually don’t create features, they perfect them. When those features are designed to hold attention, like endless feeds or loot box prompts, testers ensure they function well.
For example, they confirm Instagram’s scroll keeps going without lag. In games, they verify that reward systems tempt players to spend. Their work sharpens the user experience, including the parts that make it hard to log off.
Addictive Design Patterns – The Usual Suspects
Many software developers use psychology to boost engagement, and testers polish the results.
This includes:
- Infinite Scrolling: No stopping point, just more content. Testers ensure it runs without glitches.
- Push Notifications: Alerts about new likes or rare items. Testers time them to hit when users are likely to return, often within a day of their last use.
- Reward Loops in video games: Streaks or battle passes that nudge players back. Testers make sure these rewards trigger reliably.
These aren’t random quirks. They’re built to keep users in the loop, and testers confirm they work as planned. We really cannot blame the software testers, as about 60 percent of this is tested automatically. The question is whether they should question the intent.
The Science Behind the Hooks
Why do these features work so well? It’s all about dopamine.
A 2024 Harvard study explained that reward loops, like those in gaming or social media, trigger dopamine, the feel-good chemical. Each notification or loot drop gives a small rush, urging users to chase the next one. This mimics slot machine logic: unpredictable rewards keep people hooked.
Testing plays a role here, too. Testers ensure notifications arrive fast and rewards feel satisfying. In Call of Duty, they might confirm a battle pass tier unlocks smoothly, amplifying that dopamine hit. Science backs the design, and testers keep it running like clockwork.
The Real-World Fallout
Heavy app use affects people.
A 2024 report tied compulsive habits and high screen time to teen mental health problems, like anxiety or sleep issues. Parents see kids fixated on games like Minecraft, grades dropping, and tempers flaring over limits. Physical effects hit too: eye strain, and sore thumbs from long sessions.
This has sparked lawsuits. Families claim games like Fortnite were made to addict kids, using rewards and microtransactions. For instance, the ongoing video game addiction lawsuit argues that companies knew the risks but prioritized profit. Social media faces similar heat over engagement tactics linked to mental strain.
TorHoerman Law notes that major video game companies are facing lawsuits for intentionally designing their games for addictiveness. Plaintiffs often emphasize that children’s impulse control and risk assessment are still developing, making them prime targets.
Successes and Slip-Ups of Testing in Action
Testers have an impact.
Roblox’s 2023 loot box system passed testing, only to face “predatory” accusations from parents later. The in-game gimmick worked too well, as it took the process from the psychology of gambling: unpredictable rewards.
On Instagram, testers helped launch a “take a break” prompt after a predetermined minutes of scrolling, cutting addictive usage. 90 percent of users kept this on, seeing that it helped them unplug.
When aimed at balance, testing can shift habits. It depends on what the higher-ups want.
App Design Is Ultimately Human
Software testers don’t invent the hooks in social media and gaming apps, but they make them stick. They ensure the feed flow and rewards land, boosting engagement that’s hard to escape.
Ethically, they’re caught between doing their job and questioning its impact. With lawsuits growing and research piling up, companies face pressure to rethink design.
Next time you’re stuck scrolling or gaming, consider: what did testers prioritize here? Maybe we should all check our own limits.
Thanks in favor of sharing your thoughts about software testing ethics. The post is nice, thats why I have to read it fully.